|
June 23, 1995
It’s Not as Easy as It Sounds
Deficit reduction is the main topic in Washington this year. After President
Clinton’s 1993 deficit-reduction plan was enacted, federal red ink took a back
seat to the health care debate. But it’s back and likely to be the number one
issue in the 1996 presidential campaign.
President Clinton took the lead in reducing the deficit during his first year
in office, but now he seems uncertain where he stands—partly because he has
received so little credit for his 1993 accomplishment.
Until recently, the president’s strategy on the issue had been to attack the
Republicans for proposing to cut Medicare, Medicaid, and other important government
programs and for supporting tax cuts for the rich. This approach apparently
didn’t hold water with the public, however; he clearly has lost the initiative
there. A recent Wall Street Journal/NBC poll finds that 37 percent of
Americans now say Republicans would do a better job of reducing the deficit;
only 16 percent pick Democrats. Shortly after the president took office, the
poll showed the opposite: 39 percent picked the Democrats, and 16 percent the
Republicans.
The turnabout in public opinion may explain Mr. Clinton’s recent about-face—he
now proposes to balance the budget in ten years, with cuts in Medicare and Medicaid.
This has enraged many Democrats, who believe their strategy of blaming the Republicans
for cutting popular programs was a winner.
The Journal/NBC poll also indicates that the public clearly is unaware of what
it takes to balance the federal budget. There is solid public opposition to
any substantial cuts in Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, but large majorities
also oppose eliminating the three departments targeted by the Republicans—Education,
Energy, and Commerce.
After resisting deficit reduction for years because it was too difficult, Washington
politicians now are guilty of making it appear too easy—all we have to do is
slow the growth in spending—not touching Social Security, of course, which is
26 percent of federal spending (excluding interest on the debt). If it were
that easy, it would have been done years ago. Spending rises because of inflation,
higher caseloads, and the demand for more services. Even slowing growth in programs
such as Medicaid and Medicare will require real cuts in benefits.
The right time to balance the federal budget is during periods of economic
growth, but it nevertheless will be painful—economic growth will be dampened
in the short run, state and local governments will lose billions, life will
be tougher for the less affluent, and the middle class will lose benefits they
have come to expect. It is time for the politicians to admit this and for the
rest of us to understand that life involves choices—many of them very difficult.
Copyright © 1995
|